Archive for March, 2005

The Punjab “Problem”

Thursday, March 31st, 2005

Having grown up with the “Punjab Problem,” with its rise of Bhindranwale, the reports of people killed in “encounters” and roadblocks and all cars being searched after 10 pm on the streets of Delhi, its hard to get a grasp of the conflict. The Hindu has a thumbnail sketch of the history of the conflict, in a very readable article by Ramachandra Guha. However, it doesn’t have much to say about the immense responsibility Indira Gandhi bears for the sorry state of affairs.

More Oscar Doc Trouble

Wednesday, March 30th, 2005

The winner of the short documentary Mighty Times: The Children’s March is being criticized for using dramatic recreations that merge seamlessly with archival footage. Frieda Lee Mock, the chairperson of the prize committee is quoted in the New York Times:

“Ultimately, it’s an issue of credibility. And the question is, why wasn’t it disclosed to us, the academy members voting?”

The filmmakers claim on their website:

In order to distinguish ‘faux doc’ from archival footage, we stripe the borders of reenactment scenes with film sprockets. The net result is honorable both artistically and historically, making very clear which footage is new and which is not.

The academy received enough complaints that it got John Else (producer of Eyes on the Prize) to examine the film. NPR has an interview with him. It seems that the copies that the academy got did not have those tell-all sprocket holes.

Re-enactments have been used by documentary filmmakers since the time of Flaherty, and in our own times, news is faked with impunity, with male prostitutes posing as journalists, so its hardly shocking that two very successful “documentarians” would do the same, not to equate the “truth value” of this documentary with deceptions of the Bush administration, but it does bring up some very interesting questions about certain forms (the news report, archival footage) becoming the repository of credibility . I haven’t seen this film yet, but from the film’s website it looks as if the filmmakers are much more concerned with producing a very effective and glossy piece of work, rather than having something to say about history and its representation, or the practice of faux documentaries, which has a venerable history from Zelig to This is Spinal Tap.

Redesigned

Tuesday, March 29th, 2005

As you can see, the site has gone through some changes. I would welcome your feedback regarding the new design and features.

Bollywood Terror Screenings

Tuesday, March 29th, 2005

Bollywood Terror and the Termite TV Terror Show has several upcoming screenings:

Holi Hei!

Thursday, March 24th, 2005

Its one of my favorite festivals tomorrow and so an appropriate time to hold forth on bhang. Whether you take it in Thandai or Pakora form, the sight of otherwise respectable Auntie-jis and Uncle-jis giggling uncontrollably under the influence is not to be missed. The Holifestival.org website informs us:

Bhang was first used as an intoxicant in India around 1000 BC and soon became an integral part of Hindu culture. In the ancient text Artharvaveda, Bhang is described as a beneficial herb that “releases anxiety”. Bhang preparations were sacred to Gods, particularly Shiva. One of Shiva’s epithets was “Lord of Bhang” as he is said to have discovered the transcendental properties of the mixture.

This wonderful website goes on to inform us that Thandai is a nutritious alternative to alcohol.

One Holi, I walked out in the streets of Delhi late in the afternoon. Not a soul was in sight in this densely crowded city, not a car, not a scooter. Everybody was sleeping off their marijuana binge. What a feeling, all of North India dreaming in a haze of cannabis!

Northeast Desi Blogger Party

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2005

If you are in the East Coast on April 2, Desi and Desi-sympathetic bloggers will be chatting each other up over steaming plates of biryani. See S.Vaidya’s clever post for details.

The Devil Doll

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2005

Devildoll-1

We saw The Devil Doll by the incomparable Tod Browning today. I am a big fan of Browning’s Freaks, and this is the third film I’ve seen by him. Its got a bizarre premise: A man wronged by his partners seeks to revenge himself by using people shrunk to a doll’s size who do his bidding.

I suppose there is something pure about revenge. One is willing to believe that a character can think of nothing else but revenge for seventeen years, and the Gods or in the movie’s case, a mad scientist will send an instrument along for the purposes of justice. He seems to have been among the early directors who used double exposure in his films (A technique pioneered by Melies) and the film is a wonderful example of this technique. Devil Doll has a great performance by Lionel Barrymore as a transvestite avenger. The film’s merry disregard for realism and its grotesque flair are vintage Browning.

Wikipedia has a good entry on Browning, including an account of his last years, which were spent in seclusion, he even refused to meet family member’s at his brother’s funeral. I also found an odd site, which has a copy of his death certificate and a picture of his gravestone. Browning was born in 1880 and really did run away from home to join a circus, unlike Fellini who claims he did. And you can tell the difference. Browning is at home with his carnies and “freaks” and doesn’t actually dwell on their grotesquerie, unlike Fellini whose circus freaks are usually outside the the main character’s self, and become images of their internal dialogues.

At the Modi Protest

Monday, March 21st, 2005

It was damp and cold as I made my way to Madison Square Garden. A crowd had already gathered. It was not a very big crowd, but they were quite vocal. They had arranged for a very good sound system, so every chant and insult could be heard loud and clear (complements to the sound engineer). Among the anti-Modi and anti-Hindutva signs were some anti-Indian Army in Kashmir signs, which was confusing, I thought that the protest had been organized to protest Modi being feted by the Tri-State area Indians. It turned out that the Kashmir folks had been piggybacking on the anti-Modi protest. They were politely banished to the other side of Seventh Avenue.

A knot of policemen were setting up barriers and sort of standing around, looking rather bemused. All of them were white (Irish perhaps?, where were the Black and Latino cops?) The cops didn’t really have that much to do, I saw a lot of them trying to figure who this Modi fellow was being insulted with signs like, “US Visa Rejected.” The passersby hurried by in a typical New York rush, some holding up their fingers in a peace sign, without slowing down. There were some who paused to read signs that said, “Hitler’s plan: exterminate all Jews. Modi’s plan: exterminate all Muslims, Christians and Minorities.” There were a couple of tourists coming out of Penn Station who paused to take photographs. I hope they are having a wonderful holiday.

I was having a pretty good time too, I ran into friends I hadn’t seen in a long time, and made some new friends. Among them a photographer, Stan, who told me of a conversation he had with a participant going into the Garden. Stan asked him if it was true that two thousand people had been killed, the man very matter of factly answered, “sometimes people needed to be disciplined and taught a lesson.” Who were these people who approved of Modi”disciplining some people”? Most of them seemed like our neighborhood grocer, and rather rattled by the fellow shouting “Shame, shame” at them while holding his “Visa Rejected” poster. What are they thinking? Why don’t they know any better? They looked like they had been herded by the more affluent Indians, who were the organizers of the show. Unlike the folks who had been bussed in, most of these people weren’t wearing a tilak, and were barking orders in their walkie-talkies, and generally looking self satisfied. I spoke to a woman in a leather jacket, I asked her what she thought of the proceedings, which she had been watching with an eagle eye, she answered with great unsmiling certainty, “Modi will be the next great leader.” While she was chatting up the better heeled delegates, a man draped in a saffron shawl stood on top of the steps, not speaking to anyone and standing very still. He seemed to be committing every protestor’s face to memory. I watched him, fascinated at his concentration, till I was disturbed by a hubub behind me. Two marginal looking white people were holding a “Indian Army Out of Kashmir” poster, and yelling that the folks inside the garden were Nazis. Nobody knew who they were, where they had come from and what they were doing there. When they got into an altercation with a protester, the police intervened, the fellow and his female companion moved along, the man shouting, “You are taking away our rights of free speech bit by bit. Think about it, its for our kids, I ask you, do you want our kids to have no rights?” the cop said, “Yes,” and gently moved him along. At that point a very large man in a trench coat and hat told me to clear the sidewalk. he was the detective in charge. He was the spitting image of Orson Welles in “A Touch of Evil.” Star struck, I spent enormous amounts of video tape on this charismatic character.

On my way home, I shared a bus ride with some middle aged Gujarati people who had gone to the event, they seemed like nice people. It was chilling to think that they were unmoved by the brutal killing of so many people, and in fact they had gone to fete a leader who should be held accountable for what happened on his watch.

But The Trains Ran on Time

Sunday, March 20th, 2005

The Modi visa denial has been discussed to death. For the latest update go to Manish at Sepia Mutiny. Modi will be speaking via satellite to the Association of Indian Americans of North America, (what part of “Modi is responsible for the murder of hundreds of people” don’t they understand?) There is a protest planned which will begin at 4 pm in front of Madison Square Garden, Sunday March 20.

Also there is an excellent post by Abhi about the various conspiracies that are swirling around at the moment. Which brings me to my own conspiracy theory. I think its the BJP leadership more than the Congress leadership that wants to clip Modi’s wing, and not because they are less communal than Modi. Despite their public outcry against Modi’s visa denial, Modi has become a liability for them. At least thirty five MLAs rebelled against Modi a couple of weeks ago, complaining about his “high handed” manner. Which is sort of short hand for Modi’s administrative style, which doesn’t quite indulge in pork barrel politics. One of the reasons the BJP lost the Lok Sabha elections in Gujarat was because the powerful rich farmers lobby went against the BJP. The lobby wanted free electricity, which Modi refused, and invoked their anger. While chatting with people in Gujarat in December, I was told that Modi told the officers of the administrative service that he wanted the state to be run in an efficient manner and in return they would not be troubled by politicians, (except when it came to his pogrom project I suppose), this has been very unpopular with the other politicians in the state who are a lot more corrupt, and probably upset about not being allowed to line their coffers. At this point, I can’t resist pointing to Ashis Nandy’s account of meeting Modi:

More than a decade ago, when Narendra Modi was a nobody, a small-time RSS pracharak trying to make it as a small-time BJP functionary, I had the privilege of interviewing him along with Achyut Yagnik, whom Modi could not fortunately recognise. (Fortunately because he knew Yagnik by name and was to later make some snide comments about his activities and columns.) It was a long, rambling interview, but it left me in no doubt that here was a classic, clinical case of a fascist. I never use the term `fascist’ as a term of abuse; to me it is a diagnostic category comprising not only one’s ideological posture but also the personality traits and motivational patterns contextualising the ideology.

Modi, it gives me no pleasure to tell the readers, met virtually all the criteria that psychiatrists, psycho-analysts and psychologists had set up after years of empirical work on the authoritarian personality. He had the same mix of puritanical rigidity, narrowing of emotional life, massive use of the ego defence of projection, denial and fear of his own passions combined with fantasies of violence – all set within the matrix of clear paranoid and obsessive personality traits. I still remember the cool, measured tone in which he elaborated a theory of cosmic conspiracy against India that painted every Muslim as a suspected traitor and a potential terrorist. I came out of the interview shaken and told Yagnik that, for the first time, I had met a textbook case of a fascist and a prospective killer, perhaps even a future mass murderer.

So maybe it shouldn’t surprise anyone that he makes the “trains run on time.”

Disappeared in America

Friday, March 18th, 2005

DISAPPEARED IN AMERICA: Art, Activism & Law in the Age of Insecurity

A panel discussion on Muslim Civil Liberties after 9/11 Preceded by a screening of WHOSE CHILDREN ARE THESE? Followed by a walk-through of the DISAPPEARED IN AMERICA installation

Saturday, April 9, 2:30 PM
Queens Museum of Art, 2d Floor Auditorium

Panelists:
*Marina Budhos, author of forthcoming INVISIBLE, a young adult novel
about detentions

*Rachel Meeropol, attorney, Center for Constitutional Rights; editor of
AMERICA’S DISAPPEARED

*Aziz Huq, VISIBLE Collective; attorney at Brennan Center for Justice
at NYU Law School on democracy and national security issues

*Tariq Abdel-Muhti, son of Farouk Abdel-Muhti, Palestinian activist and
WBAI reporter who died from heart attack from complications during his
two-year detention.

*Aimara Lin, activist, Not In Our Name; granddaughter of Japanese
internees

*Theresa Thanjan, director, WHOSE CHILDREN ARE THESE?

Moderator: Naeem Mohaiemen, Director, VISIBLE, a collective of Muslim
and Other Artist-Activists

Directions